Kelly Clarkson - My life would suck without you:
The establishing shot begins
showing only the feet of the female artist as she appears to be on a swing.
This shot shows the theme of voyeurism suggested by Andrew Goodwin which
engages the arousal of the audience, creating an enigma by not showing the face
of the artist. The next shot reveals the artist, Kelly Clarkson who is on a
swing and is smiling nostalgically. The shot is a medium close-up and she is
wearing a plain black outfit, which gives an indication to a more indie/rock
genre. Her hair appears naturally curly and to female audiences she is seen to
be a positive role model as she is pretty but also natural. There is a cut to a
shot of a children’s play area in a park. The mise-en-scene of the shot
establishes two children, a boy and girl who are in the centre third of the
frame conveying their importance. The next few shots are of the two children
pushing each other but then they exchange friendship bracelets and hug. The
music is still the introduction to the song so only a guitar is playing but
gives the audience a sense of anticipation. The shots quicken as the scene of
the children is juxtaposed with the shot of Kelly on a swing, which suggests
that she is the little girl in the flashback. This is also supported by the fact
that these two scenes cross-over as we see the little girl on the swing as she
swings backwards and then Kelly is seen coming forward on the swing so it is
like they are the same person, as if showing an ellipsis.
As the vocals come in there
is a quick establishing shot of the next scene but then quickly goes back to
the original swing scene but this time Kelly looks directly at the camera and
sings. More parallels are drawn between the young girls and Kelly Clarkson as
there is a quick zoom to the friendship accessory which the young boy gave to
the little girl which has a ‘K’ on which then cuts and zooms out to the same
bracelet on the older Kelly as she opens a door to see a male figure.
The next scene is
established as Kelly’s apartment and her ‘boyfriend’s’ (aka the male actor. The
playfulness of the song is suggested through the teasing the two characters
running around the apartment in an attempt to get the keys. Each narrative
frame is juxtaposed with a performance one but it is still in the apartment but
Kelly is next to the window looking at the camera on occasions. She is wearing
a new outfit in this scene, consisting of dark jeans and a light ‘floaty‘ top
which shows her feminine side but also her pragmatic personality by wearing
trousers, also shown in her hair style being half up and half down. The scene
then diverts back the original shot of Kelly’s feet in the swinging scene
however it is changed to a different angle from the other side, possibly suggesting
a development in the plot. There is one point of view shot from the male actor’s
perspective as we see a medium close-up of Kelly tempting the audience with the
keys. This engages the audience giving a greater sense of inclusion in the
playfulness. The performance at the window of the apartment is continually
recalled in between narrative shots and Kelly only takes up one half of the
frame which may be alluding to the song’s message of being not fully happy
without her boyfriend.
The chorus then becomes apparent
as there is a transition from the apartment scene with a bright flash to a performance
new scene for the chorus. There is a medium close up of Kelly in the centre of
the frame singing with a microphone and the band is seen behind her. The main
first beat of the chorus is emphasised by a long shot showing the entire band
and the numerous big flood lights behind the performers go even brighter. This
is described my Goodwin as a “shift in emphasis” which they do in this video by
the lighting and the authenticity of the band is portrayed showing more focus
on the music. The whole chorus consists of the band performance but there are
various shots from different angles such as sweeping forward on a crane and
subtle zooms. There are many close-ups of Kelly singing and in this scene she
is wearing dark colours but they convey the genre of the song as pop/rock. The
whole of the scene is black, maintaining that focus on the music but the bright
lights add a more pop aspect. To achieve a smooth transition going into the
chorus, towards the end there are flashes which show quick narrative shots of
the girl and boy and then a shot of Kelly and her boyfriend. Both of these
shots show the same body language as the couples are far apart from each other
suggesting they have a conflict. Goodwin’s theory of a conflict between three
elements comes into play here as another conflict is introduced so that it can
be resolved in the chorus.
Once again there is another
verse where the narrative takes the majority of the shots showing Kelly
throwing her boyfriend’s clothes out of the video. Each shot is juxtaposed with
a performance shot, varying between; the first scene of the swing, the second
scene of her by the window and the chorus scene with the band. There is a
strong sense of women empowerment which is almost Kelly’s iconography with
Goodwin suggests such as her song ‘Never again’. This empowerment is used to
attract female audiences to uplift them like the song. The chorus is repeated
and the bright lights in the background are effective in highlighting the
artist. The second time the chorus comes the video complies with another concept
of Goodwin’s that is visuals in music videos illustrate, amplify or contradict
the music. Therefore in the chorus as Kelly is singing the words “my life would
suck without you” the couple are disputing and throwing each other’s things out
of the window. This shows an irony and gives a unique twist to the video.
Another theorist Alf
Bjornberg believes a strong convention of music videos is the ‘multiple
centripetal process’. This is the verse-chorus form and so the video conforms
to a cyclical structure. However there is usually always a part in the music
that is different from the rest where the sound is stripped back to the vocals.
This happens in Kelly’s video and it is used to make a greater effect of the
final chorus. Therefore the pace of shots slows down and there are more
close-ups of Kelly’s face and instruments. The backlights are dimmed which
gives a greater effect and a fan is also evident as Kelly’s hair moves. The pace
gets continually faster and then the performance scene shows Kelly who sings
the upbeat then the lights become brighter, substituting for the editing on the
beat. Many different shots are fast swopping and always moving when Kelly is
singing. Like Bjornberg suggests, a typical convention of music videos is for the
video to end with a resolution of events which is seen after all the
contradictions to the song, that Kelly and her boyfriend kiss at the end.
This video is appeals to a
mostly female audience because of the women empowerment icon and message. Kelly
is seen as a positive role model showing her natural beauty and playfulness which
engages the audience. The pop/rock genre is conveyed through the clothes that
Kelly wears and the lights play a great part in creating a cathartic response
in the audience. Therefore from this music video we will be able to use the
idea of different scene and how to juxtapose them as well as creating a slowed
down effect in the middle to make the final chorus an even greater effect.
Avril Lagvine - Smile:
Many people who we asked to
listen to Jessica Drake’s song said that she had a similar sound to Avril
Lavigne. Therefore, I thought I’d look at one of her latest videos to see
typical conventions of her pop/rock videos.
The establishing shot is in
a completely white studio, of a very long shot which shows Avril in the centre
shaking a spray can. We see her writing graffiti on the walls and her costume
supports her rebellious actions. She is wearing a short black dress with bright
colours on and is wearing Doc Martin boots conveying to consumers the rock/indie
genre. Her hair is also dyed a very unconventional colour of green in her
fringe and she is wearing a lot of eyeliner which suggests her independent and
anarchist style. There are then quick jump shots showing her writing on the
white wall and putting up posters as well as the audience seeing wires and big
amps. The concept of showing Avril setting up her set and writing on the walls
gives an indication to her more artistic message of using a white wall as a
blank canvas to express herself. She appears to subvert the idea of
imperfection as the wall could signify purity and then she writes on it to
symbolise that it is still perfect even though it has been written on. These
are many conventions that Avril conforms to in her own videos giving her an
iconography for her audience to identify her with. Therefore her existing
audience will be attracted to this rebellious but also symbolic action.
There
is then a close up of her guitar which she plugs in and plays a chord whilst
the camera zooms out. There are then a number of jump shots from different
angles such as aerial shots as she
sings; some show her lying down, others show her freely dancing. The lyrics
also represent the artist as they are explicit because she uses some swear
words but this continues to convey her rebellious and free nature. Avril looks
at the camera quite a lot and uses the studio space as the camera follows her. It
is also important to notice that the camera is continually moving, panning. The
scene then cuts to a narrative as the chorus begins which the audience is able
to identify because they have used a greyscale filter to contrast the two
scenes. The mise-en-scene establishes a typical ‘American’ street where Avril
is walking down the steps of a house. She is wearing mostly black and her tour
top, connoting the rock genre additionally as she is wearing converses which
originally signified rebellion. It appears like many videos the new scene is
established but then cuts back to the original scene but then the greyscale
scene is shown in more detail. This effect seems to be a way of keeping the
audience’s attention so they are drawn into each scene. The new scene shows
Avril picking up a small red piece of glass which is the only colour in the
scene but as of yet, the audience is unsure what the object is.
The scene is juxtaposed
with the previous one which has many close-ups of the artist. This greyscale
scene acts as the narrative in the music video yet has a different feel to more
mainstream songs such as Kelly Clarkson’s because rather than focusing on a
narrative involving Avril as the main character she acts almost like a ghost.
Therefore the narrative is constructed of ordinary people and the first scenario
we see is a couple sitting in an outside café table clearly looking upset,
assuming they have had an argument. There is an over the shoulder shot of Avril
looking at the couple who are unaware of her; giving the impression she is a
ghost-like character. She picks up another red piece of glass and the idea
begins to appear that Avril is collecting these red pieces like a treasure
hunt. As soon as she takes the piece the director cuts to a reaction shot of
the couple who suddenly smile, linking to the song which appropriately fits at
the end of the chorus. The pace of the song is less conventional than other pop
videos as the shot in the choruses are not noticeably faster than that in the
verses. Therefore there is a more laid back feel to the song because of this
feature in the music video. Continually throughout the narrative, the initial
setting in the white studio is referred to. This connects the two scenes but
also keeps the audience’s attention and the studio setting is mostly dedicated
to the artist performing with her guitar and lip syncing the words whereas the
greyscale setting focuses on the message of the song.
The music video uses some editing techniques
in parts, for example when Avril plays her guitar the shot is mirrored giving a
variety to the video and suggests an alternative genre. Also when the music
emphasises the guitar part, the shots reflect this by editing on the beat of
the guitar strums which adheres to Andrew Goodwin’s theory of the video amplifying
and illustrating the music. Like most of Avril Lavigne’s music videos, they
contain a strong element of fun which she stands for in her music. This is
shown when she emphasises her facial expressions to the camera and the camera
moves in jump shots giving it a fun feel as well as looking at the camera and
waving. In the chorus the pace of shots are unconventionally slower than the
chorus however much more panning is used and there is more focus on the
performance. The chorus also uses more editing techniques as Avril spins and
this is reversed in slow motion possibly connoting her enjoyment which she
wants to last- reflected in the lyrics.
More episodes of seemingly genuine
people are seen on the street that Avril is walking along and they instantly
become happy after she picks up the red glass from near the person. This is an
effective way of appealing to a large target audience as the people in the
narrative are of different ages, races etc which widens her target audience. Additionally
this places Avril in a positive lights as there are connotations of associating
the female artist with unloading and ultimately making her audience smile.
There appears to be a sense of Avril being the same rebellious artist yet she
is seen to subvert stereotypes and still shows her caring personality which
enables audiences to relate to her. As a more indie artist, Avril’s iconography
is identified by her challenging typical conventions whilst not deviating too
much from the music video camera shots. This is symbolised by the tiara that
she wears on her head suggesting royalty and being like a princess however by
slanting it in her hair, she conveys a subversion of the traditional which identifies
with the her audience who acknowledge imperfection in a positive light.
Avril Lavigne’s music video
also adheres to Alf Bjornberg’s theory of the ‘multiple centripetal process’.
This is because of the structure of the song, the narrative can never be linear
hence there are numerous cases of the same situation where Avril picks up the
red glass and then the person is happy. To vary this there is a section in the
music which is stripped down to only the vocals and in this video like Kelly
Clarkson’s the lighting is used to emphasise this effect. Avril sits of the
floor of the studio with the white dimmed. Then as the chorus comes for the
final time, the lights brighten and Avril stands up and moves more around the studio
space with the music whilst looking at the camera. Additionally Bjornberg
believes music videos should have a resolution to the problematisation in the verses
and at the end of the song the audience finally understand what the red pieces
of glass were. The two scenes also connect as after seeing Avril collect all of
the red pieces in the greyscale scene, we see her holding a glass red heart in
the studio setting. She holds it up to the camera and smiles linking with the
song. This maintains the audience’s attention until the very end and the heart
which is not broken appears to be made from all the broken pieces suggesting
the concept of a broken heart eventually being mended.
This video appeals to
mainly a female audience as Avril stands for strong women empowerment however
it appears she does try to reach out to other demographics through her use of
characters in the video.
These videos have helped my group and I to identify typical conventions of music videos with the genre of music we are planning to use for our artist Jessica Drake: pop/rock. Therefore we will refer back to this research when we begin storyboarding to create a video that will apply to Andrew Goodwin and Bjornberg's theories and look professionally similar to music videos in the same genre.






No comments:
Post a Comment